Skip to content

Conversation

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member

For the example application in spacetime algebra, bm(x) is at least 10x faster.

In theory we could now also write split without using bm at all:

split = LinearMatrix.from_mapping([
    # even subalgebra of D
    (D.scalar, P.scalar),
    (d01, p1),
    (d02, p2),
    (d03, p3),
    (d12, p12),
    (d23, p23),
    (d13, p13),
    (d0123, p123),

    # split(odd) = split(odd * d0)
    (d0, P.scalar),
    (d1, -p1),
    (d2, -p2),
    (d3, -p3),
    (d012, p12),
    (d013, p13),
    (d023, p23),
    (d123, -p123),
])

but I don't have a good enough understanding of what split.adjoint(p1) should be to feel comfortable doing this.

For the example application in spacetime algebra, `bm(x)` is at least 10x faster.
@arsenovic
Copy link
Member

so, pedagogically i dont think it adds anything to STA. however, i think its good because it teachs the transformation tools at the same time, and these are more generally useful

@arsenovic
Copy link
Member

i like this change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants